An analysis of the good moral choice in philosophy

Since Kant presents moral and prudential rational requirements as first and foremost demands on our wills rather than on external acts, moral and prudential evaluation is first and foremost an evaluation of the will our actions express.

The rest of this Book is a discussion of the various kinds of intellectual virtues: For one who answers this in the affirmative, see Tessmanespecially Chapter 5. Similarly, in facing situations that arouse anger, a virtuous agent must determine what action if any to take in response to an insult, and although this is not itself a quantitative question, his attempt to answer it properly requires him to have the right degree of concern for his standing as a member of the community.

The key element of justice, according to Aristotle, is treating like cases alike—an idea that set for later thinkers the task of working out which kinds of similarities e.

Good and evil

In order to assess whether a player was morally activated or morally disengaged, participants were asked to write two or three sentences about the choices they made in the game. A human will in which the Moral Law is decisive is motivated by the thought of duty.

Certainly the central issue around which all of Western ethics has revolved can be traced to the debate between the Sophists, who claimed that goodness and justice are relative to the customs of each society—or, worse still, that they are merely a disguise for the interest of the stronger—and the Platonists, who maintained the possibility of knowledge of an objective Form of the Good.

Moral dilemmas and gameplay. When discussing non-moral goods, one may make a useful distinction between inherently serviced and material goods in the marketplace or its exchange valueversus perceived intrinsic and experiential goods to the buyer.

For as we have seen, he gives a reasoned defense of his conception of happiness as virtuous activity. He draws this analogy in his discussion of the mean, when he says that every craft tries to produce a work from which nothing should be taken away and to which nothing further should be added b5— Violence as Public Entertainment But an a posteriori method seems ill-suited to discovering and establishing what we must do whether we feel like doing it or not; surely such a method could only tell us what we actually do.

The Principle of Veracity is a moral, and not just a prudential, principle because it tells you not to lie even when you could get away with it.

A critic might concede that in some cases virtuous acts can be described in Aristotle's terms. Moreover, Kant begins the Groundwork by noting that character traits such as the traditional virtues of courage, resolution, moderation, self-control, or a sympathetic cast of mind possess no unconditional moral worth, G 4: A few authors in antiquity refer to a work with this name and attribute it to Aristotle, but it is not mentioned by several authorities, such as Cicero and Diogenes Laertius, whom we would expect to have known of it.

Not only is it appropriate that I experience regret in these cases, but I would probably be regarded as morally lacking if I did not. Although Aristotle frequently draws analogies between the crafts and the virtues and similarly between physical health and eudaimoniahe insists that the virtues differ from the crafts and all branches of knowledge in that the former involve appropriate emotional responses and are not purely intellectual conditions.

Sartre disputes these two but I believe when we have moral values and we deliberate on an important choice, the process is greatly simplified and is more fulfilling as. In The Philosophy of the Good Life, Gore examines the concept of the good life as it is entertained by the famous moral leaders of humankind—Zarathustra, the Buddha, Confucius, Muhammad, Socrates, Plato and the Stoics, the Jewish prophets and, finally, Jesus Christ.

This deontological moral guide places a higher value on the individual than on maximizing the good for society. In fact, deontology actually has constraints to stop an individual from maximizing the good if it hinders following the moral standards of the guideline. Sissela Bok on lying and moral choice in private and public life – an amplification.

Robert K. Fullinwider explores and amplifies Sissela Bok’s seminal work: Lying: Moral Choice in Private and Public Life ().Lying remains in print today, nearly thirty years after its initial publication, and is widely used in the classroom.

Its continuing broad readership. Personal Moral Philosophies and Moral Choice DONELSON R. FORSYTH Virginia Commonwealth University AND produce good. These two dimensions, relativism and idealism, were initially identified The link between moral.

good militates against this moral subjectivism, he is convinced that, for Socrates, the summum bonum was not knowledge of the good, but critical analysis of one's notion of the good (pp.

Sissela Bok on lying and moral choice in private and public life – an amplification


An analysis of the good moral choice in philosophy
Rated 5/5 based on 50 review
Kant's Moral Philosophy (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)